Morningstar
RecommendedMorningstar AwardsWhats New IconETFs Whats New IconIncome Week Whats New IconThematic Investing Whats New IconSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window Icon
Fund Research & Insights

A Contrarian Approach During Covid-19

While many investors focus on buying the big winners, contrarians look for hidden gems - Orbis's Ben Preston backs companies whose share prices don't reflect their true value

Annalisa Esposito 29 May, 2020 | 10:20AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

buy

The world is facing unprecedented times. With no indication how soon a vaccine will arise or global economies will recover, investors must work out how best to deal with the uncertainty.

Ben Preston, co-manager of the Silver-rated Orbis Global Equity fund, says investors have two options: take a crystal ball out or take his approach. “I prefer to look at one company at a time, evaluate its strengths and weaknesses, and assess its intrinsic value,” he says. “This gives us a balanced portfolio, which is not dependent on one particular view of the future.”

As a contrarian investor, Preston's portfolio looks very different from many other global funds. For instance, he is underweight in his exposure US compared to the fund's benchmark, the MSCI World index. 

But swimming against the stream isn't always easy and the fund has underperformed it peers in recent years. The fund has produced annualised returns of 3.23% over the past three years, some 0.76 percentage points behind the average fund in its Morningstar Category. “We have shied away from the 'big winners', thinking their prices were excessive,” he explains. “What matters for us is the true value of a business and how much we would pay for it.”

This strategy is also known as value investing, and it is a style that has been out of favour for a number of year while growth stocks such as Amazon (AMZN) and Tesla (TSLA) have been on a continuous upward charge. It's a trend that has continued even during the Covid-19 induced sell-off. 

Preston says: “We know we are going through short-term underperfomance and we have the 'I told you so' risk, but the silver lining is that the more the share prices deviate from their long-term worth, the greater the opportunity when they do finally trade back at their true value.”

Morningstar analyst Andrew Miles shares this outlook. "Even though its short-term performance has been poor we still have conviction in Orbis Global Equity to outperform," he says. 

Counter-Intuitive Opportunities

Recently, Preston has been looking for resilient cyclical companies with good future growth prospects. He likes Germany car maker BMW (BMW) and leading provider of aluminium Arconic (ARNC). About BMW, he says: “It has the strongest balance sheet in the auto sectors, is very advanced in electronics and has a strong brand.”

The stock is rated five stars by Morningstar analysts, indicating that the shares are trading below their fair value. The stock has been hit in recent weeks by concerns about the effect of a global recession on the autos industry. Preston says: "BMW was good value before the pandemic struck and the share prices have fallen even further. In the short-term coronavirus will have an impact on the earnings, but the business a bright future ahead.”

Another theme he likes is companies benefitting from structural change in society, trends which have been accelerated by the coronavirus. Stocks set to benefit from this include Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba (BABA) and Vestas (VWS), the wind turbine producer. “They are reasonably priced and good long term prospects,” says Preston. 

The fund manager has recently narrowed down the number of names in the portfolio, cutting down the tail of smaller positions which "didn't add much value" to focus on larger holdings where he has greater conviction. He has sold, for example, his stake in Imperial Brands (IMB) and instead added to his investment in British American Tobacco (BATS): “We lost confidence in the investment thesis and when we realise we are wrong, we are not going be stubborn about it.”

He also sold some airline companies because they didn’t offer that margin of safety in the current crisis, preferring instead aircraft engine maker Rolls-Royce (RR.), which has a stronger balance sheet.

In the healthcare space, there has been huge amount of speculation around a potential vaccine for coronavrius and which company might develop it. But Preston, is looking instead  to the opportunity in health insurance companies, which he believes will benefit from reduced costs as people stay away from hospitals for non-urgent procedures. "It’s a counter-intuitive opportunity, I know; you would think that a company with high healthcare costs would be hit in current environment but actually it’s not going that way.”

Such bets have helped performance in recent months. While the fund is down 2.12% year to date, it is 1.25 percentage points ahead of its Morningstar Category average. With much uncertainty still ahead, however, Preston says the best strategy is: "Keep a cool, calm head and buy the types of company where you can look back in five or ten years and be glad you bought at today’s prices."

TAGS

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Annalisa Esposito  is a data journalist for Morningstar.co.uk

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.