Looking for Leaders (In All the Wrong Places)

The fund at the top of the leaderboard must be good, right? Wrong

Christopher J. Traulsen 23 August, 2010 | 3:32PM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Leaders and laggards charts are prominent features of most investment publications. They fulfil that basic need we all have to try and impose a degree of certainty on an uncertain world. The ability we have to fool ourselves in this regard is staggering.

The logic often seems to run: Fund X is at the top of the charts over the past three months (or six months, or 18, or 36 months) so it must be good.

That’s fine. Except that it’s not.

Read the rest of Chris Traulsen's blog on FTAdviser.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

About Author

Christopher J. Traulsen  is director of fund research, Europe and Asia, Morningstar.

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures