What Do US Jobs Figures Mean for Interest Rates?

Morningstar’s Bob Johnson sees the Fed in a tough spot trying to balance the pressure of increasing wages against a slowdown in payroll growth

Robert Johnson, CFA 11 January, 2017 | 3:46PM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn


Jeremy Glaser: From Morningstar, I'm Jeremy Glaser. The U.S. economy added 156,000 jobs in December. I'm here with Bob Johnson--he's our director of economic analysis--for his take. Bob, thanks for joining me.

Bob Johnson: Great to be here today.

Glaser: So this 156,000 was below consensus but right about where you thought that number would be when we spoke yesterday. Anything in this report that kind of surprised you in terms of the makeup of where jobs were added?

Johnson: The number one that I saw was manufacturing did a little bit better, adding about 17,000 jobs. We were really glad to see that. We've had so many of the sentiment-based indicators, the so-called PMI data and surveys showing manufacturing getting better for the last three or four months. It hasn't turned up in any real-world economic data just yet. Today's report showing manufacturing employment growth at 17,000 might be one sign that maybe we've hit some kind of bottom in manufacturing that's actually got a legitimate real-world example to point out.

Glaser: Wages were up. Is that just a function of what jobs were added, or are people really out there getting raises?

Johnson: Until we get a quarterly report, it's always hard to pull apart and say definitively. Recall, we had a pretty bad November where the hourly wage was down. This time the hourly wage was up. Well, a good part of that is because retail was weak. Nothing to write home about in the restaurant sector. Those are the two worst-paying, lowest-hour sectors. Those two had less of an impact on the overall number.

Meanwhile, manufacturing, the highest-paying sector, or one of the highest-paying sectors, had a good growth number, an unexpectedly good number. That mix helps move the number upward. It wasn't that everybody got a so much bigger raise this month, it was just the mix of how the business happened to flow in this time around.

Nevertheless, we are up about 2.9% year over year on the single month, which is not the best way to look at numbers. That number is clearly accelerating and clearly going to put pressure on corporations. The Fed may have breathed a sigh of relief when they saw the November wage number; the number going up this much in December might spook them until they pull the pieces apart.

Glaser: We now have all of 2016 numbers in. What happened with the year? What do you think 2017's going to look like?

Johnson: Yep, like the ADP data showed, I mean, just round numbers, in 2015, maybe we added 210,000 on average per month. This year, that being 2016, I'm sorry, is 180,000 jobs. I'm,[unfortunately, thinking it's probably going to be a little less than that on average in 2017. I think if you look at a couple of key sectors that's caused the growth, healthcare is going to be in a bunch of uncertainty at the beginning of the year. The housing market's looked a little bit dicey, more recently in some of the data there. It's really hard to see what avenues are going to add a lot more to growth. Not a lot, I mean, maybe it's 170,000, 175,000, but I wouldn't be looking for a big boom in employment growth. Frankly, that's probably a good thing, because there aren't a lot of workers out there to be had either.

Glaser: If we're looking at another year of slowing growth, what does that mean for the Fed? Do you see them being able to do three rate increases in 2017? Does a number like this support that kind of hike?

Johnson: Well, here's the problem, I mean, you've got that wage growth number, which may or may not be artificial, but right now at the current number of about almost 3% has got to be a little bit scary to them. They've got that on the one hand, and then on the other hand, they've got the raw number of people added the workforce and saying, "Oh, that's not the world's greatest number." They're going to have some tough decisions to make, and I think, on balance, that we may not see as many rate increases as everybody expects. I think the economy's going to turn out to be quite a bit slower than everybody thinks when we look ahead. I think everybody's too optimistic on the fourth quarter of 2016, and certainly too optimistic about the first quarter of 2017.

Glaser: Bob, as always, thanks for your analysis.

Johnson: Thank you.

Glaser: From Morningstar, I'm Jeremy Glaser. Thanks for watching.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

About Author

Robert Johnson, CFA  is director of economic analysis with Morningstar.

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures