New CEO Gives Imperial Tobacco Boost for Future

Imperial Tobacco is at a structural disadvantage to its bigger rivals, but the firm has strong competitive advantages and a good future ahead of it

Philip Gorham 26 August, 2015 | 1:38PM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Under CEO Alison Cooper, Imperial Tobacco (IMT) is slowly transforming from an also-ran – albeit a highly profitable one – to a significant player and potential consolidator in the global tobacco industry. But despite recent value-creating acquisitions in the United States, we think there is more work to do, and of the three wide-moat European cigarette manufacturers we cover, we prefer the competitive positioning of Philip Morris International and British American Tobacco due to their superior scale.

It remains at a cost disadvantage to its larger rivals

We attribute a portion of Imperial's lower returns on invested capital, averaging almost 17% over the past five years, lower than peers, to the firm's capital-intensive logistics business, which is a drag on ROIC and masks the highly profitable tobacco business, with margins in line with those of its larger competitors.

Therefore we approved when last year the firm announced that it was to partially sell Logista through an initial public offering. We expect further reductions in Imperial's economic interest in Logista because we see little benefit from owning distribution assets in the tobacco industry.

Imperial's margins are driven by its footprint in super-premium categories, and it remains at a cost disadvantage to its larger rivals. Imperial's operating costs per pack were 37p in fiscal 2014, above the 27p of Philip Morris and 28p of British American.

About 40% of total operating costs in cigarette manufacturing are fixed, so scale delivers operating leverage and lowers average cost and creates a cost advantage through procurement pricing power. Although a clear number four – excluding China – in terms of cost advantages, its overlap with its larger competitors is essentially restricted to the European Union, Ukraine, and Australia. In developing markets which make up about 60% of volume, the firm competes with local players and holds a clear cost advantage through its superior scale.

Given that Imperial is at a structural disadvantage to its bigger rivals, we think a valuation discount to Philip Morris (PM) and British American (BATS) is appropriate. However, the firm has strong competitive advantages.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Securities Mentioned in Article

Security NamePriceChange (%)Morningstar
British American Tobacco PLC2,310.00 GBX0.74Rating
Imperial Brands PLC1,774.00 GBX1.46Rating
Philip Morris International Inc93.77 USD2.82Rating

About Author

Philip Gorham  

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures