Morningstar
RecommendedMorningstar AwardsWhats New IconETFs Whats New IconIncome Week Whats New IconThematic Investing Whats New IconSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window Icon
Fund Research & Insights

High Risk in Active Managed Sector Leaders

Emerging Markets exposure has helped fuel the rise of the highest returning Active Managed funds.

Ash Kumar, 26 November, 2007 | 9:55AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size
The clear implication of the IMA Active Managed sector's heterogeneity is that comparing fund performance is only marginally useful. For the most part, the winners and losers will reflect the degree to which managers' made correct asset-class bets over the period in question--in other words, it will reflect mostly their ability to time beta, not generate alpha. The former being notoriously difficult to get right on a consistent basis, investors would do well to understand thoroughly how a fund has achieved its performance before buying in on the basis of its record. With that in mind, we'll take a look at two of the sector's leaders over the past three years

.

Far and away the sector's top returning fund in the period is Robin Geffen's Neptune Global Alpha. Geffen has never been one to shy away from taking risk, and that shows in the fund's portfolio. The fund display a combined 55 per cent exposure to Russia and Hong Kong as of 30 September. While Russia accounted for 19 per cent of the portfolio on that date, it has been as high as 35 per cent in October 2004.

Those stakes have boosted the fund's performance tremendously relative to its sector peers but we're not sure there's much point in comparing it to generic Active Managed funds--it's simply a far different animal. Moreover, the risk associated with those positions is clear. While performance of this fund has been staggering, volatility remains uncomfortably high, with sector-topping annualised standard deviation over three and five years of 15%. This then, is a fund that might be worth a look given Geffen's emerging-markets expertise but should be viewed in that context as something that belongs at the fringe of your portfolio rather than the core.

Max King and Philip Saunders' Investec Managed Growth stands also lands near the top of the three-year performance ranking. Again, however, it's worth noting that the fund invests across an array of investment trusts and open-end vehicles, many of which specialise in niche areas of the market. Its top holding as of 31 August was JP Morgan Fleming Euro Fledgling Investment. Other holdings included Genesis Emerging Markets, Martin Currie China, Prosperity Russia, and Barings Emerging Europe. The fund is clearly tamer than the Neptune offering, with a lower emerging-markets allocation and a three-year annualised standard deviation of 11.5%. Given the experience of the managers, we think it's a sound choice for investors seeking out an aggressive go-anywhere vehicle, but more cautious investors will want to look elsewhere.

The two examples above illustrate a larger pattern--emerging markets and small- and mid-cap equities have enjoyed extremely strong bull runs over the past five years. Whether or not this can continue is open to question, but high levels of risk are associated with both areas and valuations look stretched. For those reasons, for core holdings, we continue to favour somewhat steadier offerings such as the Newton Managed fund mentioned by my colleague Stephen Marriott last week.

A version of this article previously appeared in Investment Adviser, Financial Times Ltd.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

 

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.