Morningstar
RecommendedMorningstar AwardsWhats New IconETFs Whats New IconIncome Week Whats New IconThematic Investing Whats New IconSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window Icon
Fund Research & Insights

IMA Active Managed Sector: Drawn too Broadly?

This sector contains a wide array of funds that make rankings difficult to use well.

Stephen Marriott, 19 November, 2007 | 9:57AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size
The IMA's Active Managed Sector allows for a high degree of flexibility as funds in the sector can invest up to 100% of their assets in equities, whilst the only regional constraint is that at least 10% must be held in non-UK equities. Thus managers can fully participate in equity markets but also invest in a wide range of different asset classes. Given this remit the sector is a natural home to fund of funds - of the 65 funds that have performance histories of at least one year, 40 are fund of funds.

This can lead to an element of investor confusion because on occasions it may appear that a number of funds have strayed into either the IMA’s

href="http://www.morningstar.co.uk/UK/fundscreener/results.aspx?lang=en-GB&Universe=FOGBR%24%24ALL&IMASector=LC00000064">Cautious Managed or Balanced Managed sectors. And from a Morningstar perspective, funds appear across a number of different categories, ranging from Global Large-Cap Blend Equity, UK Large-Cap Blend Equity to Asia-Pacific ex-Japan Equity. However, because the goal is to retain the right to invest up to 100% of the portfolio in equities, a fund would remain in the sector. The key question then from an investor’s angle is whether fund managers have been able to fully exploit the unconstrained nature of the sector?

The highest returning quartile of funds have clearly made the most of market opportunities during the last three years (to end Sep). On average they committed 83% of their portfolios to equities and 51% to mid and small-caps. This compares to the bottom quartile which devoted 77% and 27% respectively. This was obviously a higher risk strategy and is confirmed by standard deviation: the average for the top performers was 11.2%, some 2.5 percentage points higher than the worst performers. But risk has been rewarded with the top quartile funds outperforming by an average of 7.9% per annum. So have the top performers prospered more recently? Generally, they have adapted well to changing market conditions; producing positive returns of 0.7% on average in the three months to the end of September, which compares to an average loss of 2.2% for the fourth quartile group. And they’ve reduced risk relative to the worst performers: standard deviation over 1 year for the top quartile funds is 7%, compared to 7.5% for the bottom quartile funds. A survey of the top performers shows how portfolios have been changing - some have been increasing exposure in emerging markets, whilst many have reduced their small-cap weightings and raised cash.

On average, holders of the highest returning funds have benefited from a more adventurous style of investment. However, three years is too short a period to judge success and investors need to be careful of chasing performance. On this basis we’d recommend funds that benefit from a repeatable process.

Newton Managed fulfills this objective well. It benefits from Newton’s global thematic approach, whereby the in-house team of analysts identifies good value stocks that prosper from secular trends. Up to 50% of the fund must be invested outside of the UK. Naturally there are risks; the biggest concern is an incorrect identification of a theme. And one prevalent in the fund is growing domestic consumption in emerging economies, which has led to an aggressive position in Asia. Nonetheless, the fund has produced consistent returns and is a good choice for those looking for a diverse portfolio of equities with an international flavor.

A version of this article previously appeared in Investment Adviser, Financial Times Ltd.

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

 

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.