Morningstar
RecommendedMorningstar AwardsWhats New IconETFs Whats New IconIncome Week Whats New IconThematic Investing Whats New IconSign Up to Our Newsletters Open Window Icon
ESG

Untangled: The EU's ESG Benchmark Rules

While the updates are a welcome step, they also mean providers have a raft of requirements to get to grips with

Catherine Elliott 26 January, 2022 | 11:47AM
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

Rope

Benchmark providers face major disclosure obligations that have taken effect in the last two years. It’s all to do with the EU’s wider sustainable finance action plan, which aims to channel capital flows towards sustainable investment while better managing ESG risks. In nutshell, the EU Benchmark Regulation (EU 2016/2011) has been amended on two fronts.

Firstly, all investment benchmarks will have to disclose if (and how) they incorporate ESG criteria into their processes. Secondly, new standards for carbon products have also been created with two types of climate benchmarks that aim to help investors better understand the carbon impact of their investments.

While these updates are a welcome step towards a more sustainable and transparent investing universe, they also mean providers have a raft of requirements to get to grips with.

Here’s a quick run-down of key changes and how Morningstar can help.  

Cracking Down on Greenwashing 

To improve transparency when it comes to climate-related risks and ESG considerations, as well as disincentivise greenwashing, benchmark administrators must adhere to specific ESG disclosures set out by the European Commission. The regulation applies to any category of indexes, except interest rate and currency benchmarks.

As of 30 April 2020, benchmark administrators must disclose how key elements of their methodology reflect ESG factors for each benchmark or family of benchmarks. For those specifically pursuing ESG objectives, administrators must demonstrate how the ESG factors are reflected in the benchmark. For non-ESG focused benchmarks, administrators have a non-disclosure option that requires them to explicitly state that they do not pursue any ESG objectives.

These disclosures ultimately raise the bar for benchmark providers, putting ESG considerations at the forefront of decisions and giving investors a better understanding of how providers stack up against their sustainability objectives, if they have any.

Two New Industry Standards

The European Commission has also introduced two new types of climate benchmarks: the EU Climate Transition Benchmark (EU CTB) and the EU Paris-Aligned Benchmark (EU PAB).

The EU CTBs and the EU PABs both set new minimum criteria for climate indexes, with more stringent criteria for those aligned to the Paris Agreement. In doing so, the EU hopes to provide a standardised tool to support low-carbon investment strategies.

In its final report, the Technical Expert Group (TEG) set out the minimum technical standards that any benchmark administrators who want to market a climate benchmark must adhere to. Benchmarks that comply with the minimum technical requirements will then be able to label themselves as an EU Paris-Aligned Benchmark or an EU Climate Transition Benchmark.

It’s also been announced that, as of 1 January 2022, administrators of significant benchmarks in the EU will have to provide one or more climate transition benchmarks.

Confidence in Compliance

Morningstar Indexes has recently introduced the Morningstar EU Climate Indexes, which include EU CTB and PAB variations. The indexes incorporate Sustainalytics’ Carbon Solutions and are fully compliant with EU Benchmark regulatory requirements.

The indexes can be used to guide strategic asset allocation, as benchmarks for actively managed strategies, or as the basis for creating passively-managed investable products. Sustainalytics will also offer a data package with ESG data that aligns with the benchmark regulation requirements in terms of disclosures and minimum standards for climate benchmarks.

To find out more about the EU Climate Benchmarks and ESG Disclosures, as well as the relevant solutions from Morningstar and Sustainalytics, download our free guide here

TAGS

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
Font-Size

About Author

Catherine Elliott  is a content writer at Morningstar

© Copyright 2024 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved.

Terms of Use        Privacy Policy        Modern Slavery Statement        Cookie Settings        Disclosures

The Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks is assigned based on an analyst's estimate of a stocks fair value. It is projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Morningstar assigns star ratings based on an analyst’s estimate of a stock's fair value. Four components drive the Star Rating: (1) our assessment of the firm’s economic moat, (2) our estimate of the stock’s fair value, (3) our uncertainty around that fair value estimate and (4) the current market price. This process culminates in a single-point star rating that is updated daily. A 5-star represents a belief that the stock is a good value at its current price; a 1-star stock isn't. If our base-case assumptions are true the market price will converge on our fair value estimate over time, generally within three years. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Morningstar Star Rating for Stocks, please visit here

Quantitative Fair Value Estimate represents Morningstar’s estimate of the per share dollar amount that a company’s equity is worth today. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is based on a statistical model derived from the Fair Value Estimate Morningstar’s equity analysts assign to companies which includes a financial forecast of the company. The Quantitative Fair Value Estimate is calculated daily. It is a projection/opinion and not a statement of fact. Investments in securities are subject to market and other risks. Past performance of a security may or may not be sustained in future and is no indication of future performance. For detail information about the Quantiative Fair Value Estimate, please visit here

The Morningstar Medalist Rating is the summary expression of Morningstar’s forward-looking analysis of investment strategies as offered via specific vehicles using a rating scale of Gold, Silver, Bronze, Neutral, and Negative. The Medalist Ratings indicate which investments Morningstar believes are likely to outperform a relevant index or peer group average on a risk-adjusted basis over time. Investment products are evaluated on three key pillars (People, Parent, and Process) which, when coupled with a fee assessment, forms the basis for Morningstar’s conviction in those products’ investment merits and determines the Medalist Rating they’re assigned. Pillar ratings take the form of Low, Below Average, Average, Above Average, and High. Pillars may be evaluated via an analyst’s qualitative assessment (either directly to a vehicle the analyst covers or indirectly when the pillar ratings of a covered vehicle are mapped to a related uncovered vehicle) or using algorithmic techniques. Vehicles are sorted by their expected performance into rating groups defined by their Morningstar Category and their active or passive status. When analysts directly cover a vehicle, they assign the three pillar ratings based on their qualitative assessment, subject to the oversight of the Analyst Rating Committee, and monitor and reevaluate them at least every 14 months. When the vehicles are covered either indirectly by analysts or by algorithm, the ratings are assigned monthly. For more detailed information about these ratings, including their methodology, please go to here

The Morningstar Medalist Ratings are not statements of fact, nor are they credit or risk ratings. The Morningstar Medalist Rating (i) should not be used as the sole basis in evaluating an investment product, (ii) involves unknown risks and uncertainties which may cause expectations not to occur or to differ significantly from what was expected, (iii) are not guaranteed to be based on complete or accurate assumptions or models when determined algorithmically, (iv) involve the risk that the return target will not be met due to such things as unforeseen changes in changes in management, technology, economic development, interest rate development, operating and/or material costs, competitive pressure, supervisory law, exchange rate, tax rates, exchange rate changes, and/or changes in political and social conditions, and (v) should not be considered an offer or solicitation to buy or sell the investment product. A change in the fundamental factors underlying the Morningstar Medalist Rating can mean that the rating is subsequently no longer accurate.

For information on the historical Morningstar Medalist Rating for any managed investment Morningstar covers, please contact your local Morningstar office.

For more detailed information about conflicts of interest, including EU MAR disclosures, please see the “Morningstar Medalist Rating Analyst Conflict of Interest & Other Disclosures for EMEA”here

Select Your Site Edition To make sure the site is relevant to you, we need to know if you’re an individual investor or a financial professional.