Unilever Fair Value Upgraded by Analysts as Sterling Falls

Unilever is one of the strongest emerging-market plays in consumer staples, and despite the recent slowdown, analysts believe this exposure offers growth potential

Philip Gorham 15 March, 2016 | 10:59AM

Following 2015 results, Morningstar equity analysts are raising the fair value estimate for Unilever to £31 from £29 to account for the depreciation in sterling against the euro since our last update. Unilever's scale and scope give it competitive advantages, and with 58% of sales generated in emerging markets, the firm offers substantial exposure to growth markets.

Competition in Unilever's core markets is likely to be intense

However, although we view the shift in emphasis to personal care from packaged food as a net positive, Unilever will probably have limited success in expanding its volume and margins simultaneously, given the highly competitive nature of its categories.

Management's stated objective is to achieve organic sales growth, driven by volume, at an above-market rate; we view this as an appropriate strategy that is likely to consolidate the firm's moat over time. As retail is a low-margin, volume-driven business, this should help cement Unilever's place as a primary vendor that is entrenched in its customers' supply chains globally.

The company should benefit from tailwinds from the structural shift to faster-growing personal care from food, the potential disposal of the developed-markets spreads business, geographic white space opportunities and premiumisation in laundry and beauty care; these tailwinds should help Unilever achieve volume-driven organic growth. However, a more-focused Procter & Gamble is also pursuing volume growth, as are others, and competition in Unilever's core markets is likely to continue to be intense.

It is this intense competition that makes us somewhat sceptical on Unilever's margin opportunity. After several years of optimising the cost structure and achieving mid-single-digit emerging-markets volume growth, Unilever's mid-cycle earnings before tax margin has barely improved, rising around 100 basis points to 15%. This is at the low end in the HPC group and well below firms in other staples categories. It is indicative of the categories' competitiveness that cost savings rarely flow through to the bottom line, with neither Unilever nor P&G consistently achieving their volume targets.

For the past two years, Unilever has spent 17% of its revenue on marketing and research and development costs; we suspect this expenditure will act as a cap to margin expansion, since over time, the highly competitive operating environment and commodification of brands may drive these expenditures higher still.

 

The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell a security or securities noted within nor should it be viewed as a communication intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. The information contained within should not be a person's sole basis for making an investment decision. Please contact your financial professional before making an investment decision.

Securities Mentioned in Article

Security NamePriceChange (%)Morningstar
Rating
Unilever PLC5,070.00 GBX-0.41

About Author

Philip Gorham  

Audience Confirmation


By clicking 'accept' I acknowledge that this website uses cookies and other technologies to tailor my experience and understand how I and other visitors use our site. See 'Cookie Consent' for more detail.

  • Other Morningstar Websites